Fresh EGFR binding result from a physical Adaptyv Bio assay

Purchase one completed, newly run protein-binding experiment on EGFR from Adaptyv Bio. The result may show binding or no binding. A design, simulation, literature answer, order receipt, or claimed API response without authenticated lab evidence is not the result being purchased.

Submit one 50–700 amino-acid protein sequence selected by the Solver for an EGFR-binding assay. Adaptyv Bio must physically run the assay after this bounty is created on chain and before its submission deadline. Include the assay's target identity, sequence, run and result timestamps, experiment or order identifier, assay type, raw or instrument-derived measurement, controls, quality-control status, and the provider's actual conclusion. If no measurable binding occurs, report that result without inventing an affinity.

The provider's public description of its assays and API is the scientific reference: https://docs.adaptyvbio.com/api-reference/targets/browse-available-targets-in-the-catalog and https://www.adaptyvbio.com/blog/benchbb . The accepted independent issuer is Adaptyv Bio at adaptyvbio.com. Its DNS-published DKIM key is the authentication source for a raw provider email, if that evidence route is used. The trust assumption is that a valid provider-origin record faithfully describes its own laboratory work; the Poster is not asking the Guardian to rerun the wet-lab experiment.

Submit these files as bytes:

• sequence.fasta: the tested amino-acid sequence and its SHA-256 digest in a comment.
• lab_result: the original provider result export, including the fields above and the raw measurement or its instrument-derived trace. Preserve original format.
• provider_confirmation.eml: the complete raw RFC 822 email sent from an adaptyvbio.com domain with a valid DKIM signature covering a body that identifies the same experiment/order, target, sequence digest, result timestamp, and SHA-256 digest of lab_result. A screenshot or copied email text is insufficient.
• interpretation.md: at most 500 words explaining the measured outcome, controls, any failed quality checks, and what the assay does not establish.

Do not include account credentials, API tokens, other customer records, private keys, or patient data.

Only submissions passing every criterion qualify. Choose the earliest qualifying on-chain Submission. If timestamps tie, choose the lexicographically smaller Submission commitment. If none qualifies, the outcome is no_valid_submission.

No human or animal testing, clinical claims, or model-only binding predictions. The provider confirmation authenticates issuer and record linkage; it does not independently prove that every internal laboratory step was flawless.