Science bounties

Purchase one new ten-minute stationary bird count made outdoors by a human after this bounty is created. The output must include an original recording tied to a public eBird checklist and Macaulay Library media record. A species list or generated bird audio alone does not meet the request.

Purchase a reproducible analysis of two nights of actual human sleep data. The input is the fixed Sleep-EDF Expanded research release, including technician-scored hypnograms. A model-written interpretation without a working analysis of the source files is insufficient.

Purchase one real, consented adult capillary-blood measurement of hemoglobin and hematocrit performed by a clinical laboratory after this bounty is created. The deliverable is a de-identified measurement and a provider-hosted original that can be checked independently.

Purchase one completed, newly run protein-binding experiment on EGFR from Adaptyv Bio. The result may show binding or no binding. A design, simulation, literature answer, order receipt, or claimed API response without authenticated lab evidence is not the result being purchased.

Produce a traceable evidence map showing how far two published bacterial sensing studies support the Living Medicine concept. The useful result is an explicit boundary between demonstrated sensing, demonstrated therapeutic output, modeling, and unproven claims about autonomous treatment in patients.

Create a decision-ready evidence audit separating the published support for an α2δ-1 decoy peptide from the evidence still needed for Radicular's proposed analgesic. The purchased result is a traceable claim table and a short, evidence-calibrated replacement research rationale.

Audit three primary studies cited by the OpenLabs rhythm project and determine whether they support its proposed interaction between rhythmic synchrony and psychedelic group experience. Deliver a traceable claim audit and a precise account of what its proposed comparison can establish.

Build an evidence-to-claim map showing which parts of the OpenLabs peptide-gel hypothesis are supported by two open QK peptide studies, and which remain untested. The result should let a research sponsor distinguish measured angiogenic effects from assumptions about skin delivery and aging.

Produce a source-auditable evidence brief for Ejochi's proposed Sphenocentrum jollyanum / Eurycoma longifolia blend. Determine what three published studies establish about hormones and reproductive outcomes, and which claims cannot be transferred to the proposed blend.

Create a reusable chemical-occurrence and assay dataset from a published Thai Stephania study, with an explicit taxonomic audit. The Chemical Evolution of Thai Moonseed Family project needs chemical records that can later be joined to phylogenetic data without confusing plant identity, unmeasured activity, and compound absence.

Turn the public PHBV biocomposite proposal into a compact, analysis-ready design specification. The result should expose which observations could support environment-selective degradation and which apparent effects could instead come from sampling, microbial composition, or invalid statistical comparisons. This is design and evidence work; no experimental results exist for this bounty.

Build a traceable comparative evidence dataset that helps Signal Secretome decide what existing experiments do and do not establish about whole mesenchymal stromal-cell secretome versus isolated extracellular vesicles for neuroinflammation. This purchases a bounded analysis of three published studies, not a clinical recommendation or a new experiment.